Intel vs. Snapdragon: We test HP’s Envy x2 with both on speed, battery life and more - leehaile1944

We just spent a week quick-eared about the future of Qualcomm's PC chips. Now IT's time to return to the stage. Until the Snapdragon 8cx comes out around Q3 2019, the conflict of Intel vs. Snapdragon is existence dog-tired in stores and online, with the scrappy Snapdragon 835 and 850 cladding a small army of Intel mobile CPUs.

Should you buy a laptop with a tried-and-true Intel chip, Beaver State an upstart from mobile leader Qualcomm? While it's in the main accepted that the Intel chips whir improved performance, and the Snapdragon chips proffer better battery life, we had a unique opportunity to dive deep into the differences when we tested two versions of HP's Begrudge x2: one with Qualcomm's Snapdragon 835, the other with Intel's 7th-gen, contrabass-power, Inwardness i5-7Y54. Some are merchant marine products still being actively sold by HP today.

It's about as apples-to-apples as you can get along. And while the results aren't exactly surprising, they do highlighting the clear choices you can make if you buy nowadays—and the challenges Qualcomm faces atomic number 3 it tries to catch up to Intel.

Gordon Mah Ung

The HP Enviousness X2 comes in Intel or Qualcomm ARM trim with the only discerable difference existence the amount of ports (the Intel version has two USB-C while the Qualcomm-one has one USB-C).

Two HP Envy x2s face murder

The Enviousness x2s we reliable are most superposable. Both versions feature 12-inch, 1920×1280 touchscreens with compose fend for, atomic number 3 well as Superficial-esque keyboard covers (although the Intel version's cover is horrible.) Both also lineament 49-watt-hour batteries  and both, naturally, unravel Windows 10.

The Intel Center-based tablet came from the factory with 64-spot Windows 10, while the Snapdragon-based tablet came with Windows 10 in S-way. For this comparing, we used the alternative to flip-flop the latter lozenge to full Windows 10.

Combined last bank note: Although HP only sells the Envy x2 with 4GB Aries/128GB warehousing configurations, the Qualcomm-settled Envy x2 we borrowed featured 8GB RAM/256GB of UFC storage. So while, it's not quite smooth, the advantage here goes to the Qualcomm-based tablet.

Cinebench R11 performance

Our eldest test is Maxon's Cinebench R11. This benchmark is older than the popular Cinebench R15, but IT runs on the 32-bit but ARM-based Envy X2. It still relies on a real-public engine used in the company's Cinema4D (albeit much older at this point in time.) The test is multi-rib, and the more cores and threads you throw at it, the faster IT gets.

At the start glint, the results for the Snapdragon 835 aren't cracking. But if you looking on the bright side, the Intel chip is only about 57 pct quicker. Because the Snapdragon 835 is an 8-core CPU, and because this examination is multi-threaded, it gets a fairly modest boost, even up if quadruplet of its cores are short-power "little" cores, and only quadruplet are more powerful "big" cores.

IDG

Using Maxon's older Cinebench R11 in 32-bit mode, the Snapdragon 835 trails the 7th-gen Core i5-7Y54, though by less than we thought.

To find outgoing the performance of to each one individual core, we set Cinebench R11 to run in single-threaded way. The results are far worse for Snapdragon: The uninominal-core performance of a 5-watt Substance i5-7Y54 is about 373 percent faster than the solitary-pith performance of a Kryo CPU inside the Snapdragon 835.

IDG

The lone-core public presentation of the Kryo 280 CPU in the Snapdragon 835 is pretty terrible compared to the 5-watt Core i5-7Y54.

Tabletmark 2017 Performance

We next ran Tabletmark 2017. This is a cross-political platform benchmark made by BAPCo for measuring performance on Windows, Android, and iOS tablets. IT uses custom-written applications for each OS, and each Oculus sinister's APIs for basic functions such Eastern Samoa photo and picture sharing, and browsing. The latest interpretation happening Windows 10 supports UWP and was rewritten to support the new OS.

The results are ameliorate, but if Tabletmark 2017 is an indication of "business application use," then the Kernel i5 is about 200 percent faster than the Snapdragon 835.

IDG

Tabletmark 2017 measures browse, and photo and video sharing. The Snapdragon 835 performs about as well as an Atom X5 chip (in other language, not that swell).

What's retention back Snapdragon

We could show more benchmarks with the Snapdragon 835 likely trailing the Core i5 (sometimes away big margins), but the song remains the same: Continual Windows 10 apps, smooth UWP apps from the Windows store, doesn't remnant fountainhead for the Snapdragon 835. Instead, Lashkar-e-Tayyiba's try to find tabu a miniscule more about why the Snapdragon 835 might be so far behind even a mid-range Congress of Racial Equality i5 low-power chip.

For that we turn to the modish version of Geekbench 4. The benchmark lets you measure performance in x86 and besides running native ARM code. Commend, Windows has been mainly an x86 operating system; running the Bone and applications on Branch is a bit like speaking a different language at full speed.

To make book of instructions for x86 work on ARM work, Microsoft and Qualcomm translate the binary instructions now. This translation chuck performance, and we produce a glimpse of how much information technology costs using Geekbench 4.3.0.

The thirster purple exclude is the performance of the Snapdragon 835 running without interlingual rendition in its native linguistic process. Information technology's a huge jump in performance for the ARM cow dung and shows what it could do if it didn't have to shin such with Windows. The second purple relegate below is the performance in x86 after IT has been translated and executed. There's that performance gap.

IDG

Geekbench lets you test both x86 translated performance and homegrown Weapon performance of the ARM chip inside the HP Envy x2.

If you believe the Snapdragon is magically made as solid as the 7th-gen Core i5 based happening the supra results—remember that's the multi-core performance where we're talking eight cores on the Snapdragon 835 vs. two cores on the Intel Core chip with Hyper-Threading.

Geekbench's single-core functioning gives you a better idea of how far Qualcomm has to go in front it can declare victory or even parity. The shorter purple bar, again, is x86 translated, and it's playing worsened than an Atom X5 in a Superficial 3. Native public presentation, is far, far better, though still a behind what you'd see in a Pentium 4415Y in the new Surface Go.

IDG

The Snapdragon 835's single-core execution is slower than an Atom X5 in Surface 3 when it has to go through and through the transcriber, but running native Gir operating instructions, it's actually close to a Pentium 4415Y in the inexperienced Surface Endure.

Hitherto we've adjusted on the Kryo CPU inside the Snapdragon 835, but there's also a graphics core. UL's new Futuremark Night Raid DX12 examine supports ARM-based CPUs running Windows 10. That means we should see the record-breaking performance from the Snapdragon 835's Adreno 540 GPU, kind of than having to deal with real-time binary translations of operating instructions.

The results are what we've come up to expect. The Intel HD615 in the Core i5 is near 68 percent faster than the Adreno 540 in the Snapdragon 835.

IDG

Intel's HD615 organic graphics is about 68 percent faster than the Snapdragon's Adreno 540, even when running pure ARM code.

Futuremark also measures and breaks impossible Central processor performance when doing game physics. Remember that this result is a multi-threaded test, so it's not astonishing that the Snapdragon 835's eight cores prevail over the Intel Core bit's two.

IDG

The Intel Core i5-7Y54 finds itself at disadvantage when running multi-gist, game physics tests. We are, however, talking about 8-heart and soul Snapdragon vs. 2-core Intel Core.

Assault and battery Performance

Our last official test solvent is the one reason you might want to consider the HP Envy X2 with ARM over Intel—bombardment life.

To measure that, we set both tablets to airplane mode and jell the brightness to the same 250 to 260 nits. That's place-glistering—non I'm-nerve-wracking-to-eke-out-a-day-of-rivulet-time brightness. We then loop a 4K video victimization Windows Movies & TV while playing audio through an in-auricle headset.

The results speak up for themselves. First, we give the sack't sound off about the Envy x2 with Intel. It's fundamentally 10 hours of playback. But when you want to go for the gold, the Begrudge x2 with Qualcomm gives you a doltishly farsighted 16 hours of scarper time.

IDG

The Intel-supported Invidia x2 gives you a dandy 10 hours of video playback on electric battery, but the Qualcomm-supported Envy x2 gives you a stupid-good 16 hours.

Conclusion: Intel vs. Snapdragon

The primary conclusion is that the binary translation Microsoft and Qualcomm uses is pretty cool. It lets tablet and laptop users along Fortify run their received Windows applications. That's what separates today's ARM-based tablets from the complete and utter failures that Windows RT tablets were in 2013.

That groovy sport though, is likewise what makes Windows 10 on ARM painfully slow. Using a Windows ARM tablet, you'd swear it was Core-class reactivity in some applications like Edge, Office or Windows. But hit a non-native application, like Google Chrome or Slack, and the ARM tablet slows to a cringe that would make a escargot shoot his high-beams at you so it can pass.

The choice is clear: The Intel-founded Envy x2 (available at HP.com) offers the outflank compounding of performance and battery life. It's the boilersuit winner. But the Snapdragon-based Envy x2's 16 hours of battery life is nothing to sneeze at, assuming your priority is battery life over performance. It also currently costs about $100 less via HP.com than the Windows interlingual rendition.

Take this verdict as current sort o than final, though. The Snapdragon 835 is a get-go-generation attempt from Qualcomm. Given the speed at which the company iterates SoCs for tablets and phones, it's entirely manageable ARM will exist a executable choice for Windows someday. This is just round 1 in what could to be a extendible fight.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/402968/intel-vs-snapdragon-we-test-hps-envy-x2-with-both.html

Posted by: leehaile1944.blogspot.com

Share this post